What Is An Agreement Between Citizens And Their Government
Building on the work of Emmanuel Kant, with his presumption of borders for the state, John Rawls (1921-2002) proposed in A Theory of Justice (1971) a contractual approach in which rational persons in hypothetical „position of origin“ would set aside their individual preferences and abilities under a „veil of ignorance“ and accept certain general principles of justice and legal organization. This idea is also used as a theoretical formalization of the concept of equity. In 1775, delegates met again for the second Continental Congress. The armed conflict began with skirmishes between colonial militias and British troops in Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. Congress has designed a statement of causes explaining the reasons for the rebellion of the colonies. On July 2, 1776, Congress declared American independence from Britain and signed the declaration of independence two days later. The Constitution is the oldest and shortest written constitution of modern times, the culmination of American (and British/European/Greek/etc.) political thought on governmental power. The brothers in this contract were not like-minded people, oriented towards thought or purpose. Born out of distress after the failure of the first revolutionary government, the Constitution contained several pragmatic compromises. 230 years later, the U.S. government still needs compromises to function. 33. There has never been some kind of absolute justice, but only agreements that have been made in the context of a mutual relationship between men in different places, at different times, who oppose the addition or suffering of evil.
 As no party in the present era can self-support itself without a philosophical or speculative system of political or practical systemic principles. We therefore see that each of the factions in which this nation is divided has put in place a first-rate structure to protect and cover the system of action it pursues. … A party [defender of the absolute and divine right of kings or tories], by persecuting the government up to DEITY, strives to make it so holy and inviolable that it must not be less than sacrileil, however tyrannical, to touch it or invade it in any article. The other party [the Whigs, or believers in the constitutional monarchy], by the creation of the government as a whole with the agreement of the PEOPLE, accept that there is some kind of initial treaty by which the subjects have implicitly reserved the power of resistance to their sovereign, if they are pressed by the authority with which they have voluntarily entrusted themselves for specific purposes.